<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Totally Unofficial Top 10 Films of the Decade List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nerdles.com/2010/01/23/another-totally-unofficial-top-10-films-of-the-decade-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nerdles.com/2010/01/23/another-totally-unofficial-top-10-films-of-the-decade-list/</link>
	<description>Nerd News.  TV News, Movie Reviews and other Nerd Stuff!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:02:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keath Ledger</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdles.com/2010/01/23/another-totally-unofficial-top-10-films-of-the-decade-list/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>Keath Ledger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdles.com/?p=13486#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>I must congratulate you on this bogus list of movies. I&#039;m a regular nerdles reader and I can&#039;t believe this badly written garbage has been published, is there no screening these days?

Let me begin...

10. Are you trying to say that the only good things about this film are the direction and acting? and that Cormac McCarthy&#039;s &quot;relatively simple&quot; story is carried by them?

9. &quot;Without spoiling this fantastic narrative it would be ignorant for me to highlight the conclusive scenes of the film&quot;
I&#039;m sorry, but does this actually mean anything at all? I&#039;ve read it and re-read it, and even asked some other people to read it. Unfortunately we&#039;ve a;; come to the conclusion it&#039;s a hollow and pretentious sentence that means and makes about as much sense and nothing.

8. Please never use the term &quot;film aficionado&quot; ever again. Anyone who would refer to themselves as one is not worth knowing.

7. I can&#039;t bring myself to comment on this, it&#039;s just far too bad.

6. You say this depicts human nature, but do not say where? could you please elaborate as I&#039;m rather confused? I can&#039;t help but think you have no clue what you&#039;re saying and this is just a regurgitated hash of other critic&#039;s opinions.
 
5. Are you really trying to explain to the audience that a Batman movie as actually based on Batman comics? This could be news to the entire world! I know myself and nearly everyone else I know thought it was a biopic of a real life Batman who stalked the streets of the real Gotham City looking for eccentric villains. No, wait...

4. I love this review, it contains what is perhaps the most fitting line ever written; &quot;as much as I love this film I can’t do it justice in words&quot;, this could sum up your entire writing style.

NB: The correct use of a semicolon.

3. Why throughout the movie were your eyes welling with tears? were the &quot;visuals and character design&quot; too much? was story too much? I must admit that I&#039;m a tad confused.

2. My biggest gripe with this little segment was the seemingly random mention of Zack Snyder, whatever did he do to you? Is there no room in this town for two &quot;visionary directors&quot;? Was it necessary to mention him? I think not. Name dropping is not big of clever.

1. Sorry, I didn&#039;t read this part. I just couldn&#039;t put myself through it. Again, I&#039;m sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must congratulate you on this bogus list of movies. I&#8217;m a regular nerdles reader and I can&#8217;t believe this badly written garbage has been published, is there no screening these days?</p>
<p>Let me begin&#8230;</p>
<p>10. Are you trying to say that the only good things about this film are the direction and acting? and that Cormac McCarthy&#8217;s &#8220;relatively simple&#8221; story is carried by them?</p>
<p>9. &#8220;Without spoiling this fantastic narrative it would be ignorant for me to highlight the conclusive scenes of the film&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m sorry, but does this actually mean anything at all? I&#8217;ve read it and re-read it, and even asked some other people to read it. Unfortunately we&#8217;ve a;; come to the conclusion it&#8217;s a hollow and pretentious sentence that means and makes about as much sense and nothing.</p>
<p>8. Please never use the term &#8220;film aficionado&#8221; ever again. Anyone who would refer to themselves as one is not worth knowing.</p>
<p>7. I can&#8217;t bring myself to comment on this, it&#8217;s just far too bad.</p>
<p>6. You say this depicts human nature, but do not say where? could you please elaborate as I&#8217;m rather confused? I can&#8217;t help but think you have no clue what you&#8217;re saying and this is just a regurgitated hash of other critic&#8217;s opinions.</p>
<p>5. Are you really trying to explain to the audience that a Batman movie as actually based on Batman comics? This could be news to the entire world! I know myself and nearly everyone else I know thought it was a biopic of a real life Batman who stalked the streets of the real Gotham City looking for eccentric villains. No, wait&#8230;</p>
<p>4. I love this review, it contains what is perhaps the most fitting line ever written; &#8220;as much as I love this film I can’t do it justice in words&#8221;, this could sum up your entire writing style.</p>
<p>NB: The correct use of a semicolon.</p>
<p>3. Why throughout the movie were your eyes welling with tears? were the &#8220;visuals and character design&#8221; too much? was story too much? I must admit that I&#8217;m a tad confused.</p>
<p>2. My biggest gripe with this little segment was the seemingly random mention of Zack Snyder, whatever did he do to you? Is there no room in this town for two &#8220;visionary directors&#8221;? Was it necessary to mention him? I think not. Name dropping is not big of clever.</p>
<p>1. Sorry, I didn&#8217;t read this part. I just couldn&#8217;t put myself through it. Again, I&#8217;m sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Films of the Decade &#171; Behind the Screen</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdles.com/2010/01/23/another-totally-unofficial-top-10-films-of-the-decade-list/#comment-2050</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Films of the Decade &#171; Behind the Screen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdles.com/?p=13486#comment-2050</guid>
		<description>[...] so please check out my latest article on there.&#160; Top 10 Films of the Decade. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so please check out my latest article on there.&nbsp; Top 10 Films of the Decade. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 232/233 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.nerdles.com @ 2012-02-09 20:25:10 -->
